Results 1 - 10 for Comparison of BitTorrent clients

Pitfalls for ISP-friendly P2Pdesign
Random peering is the default behavior of BitTorrent trackers, and it serves as our basis for comparison. Some BitTorrent clients have been extended touse latency-based heuristics for ...
http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/piatek/papers/piatek_hotnets09_p2p_isps.pdf
open  pop

Royal Holloway
Another study entitled 'BitTorrent Client Comparison' [7] compared over 20 clients for nine specific properties that they considered 6 Peer to Peer is the term used to describe a ...
http://www.ma.rhul.ac.uk/static/techrep/2008/RHUL-MA-2008-04.pdf
open  pop

A BitTorrent Implementation and Simulation
... 1 BT:UAtk in Action Figure 5.2 BTOrig Results for Comparison with BT ... As mentioned in Section 1, BitTorrent uses a tit-for-tat mechanism, whereby clients decide for themselves how to ...
http://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~teoweili/BitTorrent.pdf
open  pop

P2P Comparison Report
3 Characteristics of P2P Systems A comparison of popular P2P systems is done in [LCP+04 ... Creator of a torrent file can decide the piece size. BitTorrent clients download and upload ...
http://delco.cs.tut.fi/doc/other/p2p_analysis_v01.pdf
open  pop

Free Ridingin BitTorrentis Cheap
In comparison to the official client, BitThiefopens connections much faster. ... An alternative is used by recent BitTorrent clients: A dis-tributedtracker protocol which ...
http://dcg.ethz.ch/publications/hotnets06.pdf
open  pop

How Efficient is BitTorrent?
Then we performa comprehensive comparison between BitTorrent ... In addition, a BitTorrent client may optimistically unchoke more than one clients when it is snubbed from ...
http://www.ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu/tr/TR185.pdf
open  pop

Impact of Inner Parameters and Overlay Structure on the Performance of ...
We have adopted this convention to ease the comparison between different parameter choices for BitTorrent. B. Clients Capacities We consider files consisting of pieces of 256 Kbytes.
https://www.eurecom.fr/util/publidownload.fr.htm?id=1927
open  pop

Achieving High-Bandwidth Peer-to-Peer File Distribution
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 <15 clients 15-20 clients >20 client BitTorrent download time ( s ) Slurpie download time (s) Figure2: Comparison of download times for ...
http://conferences.sigcomm.org/co-next/2008/CoNext08_proceedings/StudentWorkshopPapers/26.pdf
open  pop

P2P proxy/cache
... connection is the extremely slow latency generally about 500-900ms [5] (for comparison ... not the case then MiTM on HTTPS can be still successful because majority of BitTorrent clients ...
http://stargate.cnl.tuke.sk/~klimek/P2P_proxy_cache_projekt.pdf
open  pop

ACross-layer Decentralized BitTorrentfor Mobile Adhoc Networks*
Our perf ormance comparison studies show that BTM is able to out-performBTIin ... all nodes with a full copy of a file ( seed nodes) leave the network, BitTorrent clients are no ...
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~rajagopa/btm.pdf
open  pop

Featured Results: